e-ISSN: 2717-7157
  • Home
  • Aims and Scope
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Table of Contents
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
Current Issue
Archive
Search
Online Subscription Login
Subscription Form
Most Popular
Download Articles Read Articles
Automated Perimetry
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
Intra Ocular Lens Power Calculation and Optic Biometry...
Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma
Visual Field Defect and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defect in a Case of Optic Nerve Head Drusen...
Current Minimal Invasive Angle Procedures Without Implants for the Treatment of Glaucoma...
Intra Ocular Lens Power Calculation and Optic Biometry...
Automated Perimetry
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
Visual Field Defect and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defect in a Case of Optic Nerve Head Drusen...
Glokom-Katarakt 2022 , Vol 17 , Num 2
Abstract Free Full Text Similar Articles Mail to Author
Comparison of Anterior Segment Parameters between Cases with Refractive Error and Emmetropia
Suleyman Gunaydin1, Emine Malkoc Sen2, Kemal Tekin3, Ufuk Elgin2
1Antakya Eye Hospital, Hatay, Turkey
2University of Health Science, Ulucanlar Eye Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye, Ankara
DOI : 10.37844/glauc.cat.2022.17.13 Purpose: It was aimed to compare the anterior segment findings between the cases with refractive error and the emmetropic cases without refractive error.

Materials and Methods: Overall, 311 eyes of 311 participants were included in this cross-sectional study. In all participants, the parameters including flat keratometry (K1), step keratometry (K2), mean keratometry (Km), maximum keratometry (Kmax), central corneal thickness (CCT), apex corneal thickness (ACT), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), cornea volume (CV), anterior chamber volume (ACV), anterior chamber depth (ACD) and anterior chamber angle (ACA) were measured using Pentacam HR.

Results: Of the participants, 81 (26%) were emmetropic (Group 1) while 71 (22.8%) had myopia (Group 2), 74 (23.8%) had hypermetropia (Group 3), 67 (21.5%) had myopic astigmatism (Group 4), and 18 (5.8%) had hypermetropic astigmatism (Group 5). Significant differences were found in anterior chamber parameters (ACA, ACV, ACD) between groups (p<0.001, for all). Regarding corneal parameters, there were significant differences in K2, Kmax and KV (p<0.001, p<0.001, p<0.003; respectively) while there were no significant differences K1 and Km values (p=0.590, p=0.140; respectively) between groups.

Conclusion: Myopic eyes had higher ACA, ACV, and ACD values compared to hyperopic and emmetropic eyes. ACV and ACD parameters were significantly lower in hyperopic eyes than emmetropic eyes. Keywords : refractive error, cornea, anterior segment, pentacam HR

Home
Aims and Scope
Editorial Board
Instructions for Authors
Table of Contents
Contact